<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>10207nam a22002537a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250214222602.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      s1965                        eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">KD35.U6.1 C87C 1965</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cushman, Robert E.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Cases in constitutional law [2nd]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">New York : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Appleton-Century-Crofts, </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1965</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1007 p. ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="b"> 24 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Preface --
Acknowledgments --
Table of Cases --
Part I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIPS . The Constitution SECTION A Change, Interpretation, and Enforcement  --
1. AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION --
Hawke v. Smith --
Coleman v. Miller --
2. POWER OF THE COURTS TO INTERPRET AND ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION --
JUDICIAL REVIEW: ESTABLISHMENT --
Marbury v. Madison --
Eakin v. Raub --
JUDICIAL REVIEW: PRINCIPLES GOVERNING ITS EXERCISE --
Muskrat v. United States --
Luther v. Borden --
Massachusetts v. Mellon --
Nashville, C. &amp; St. L. Ry. v. Wallace --
UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTES --
Effect of Unconstitutionality --
Partial Unconstitutionality --
Carter v. Carter Coal Company --
SECTION B. The Three Departments: Relationships and Controls --
3. PRINCIPLE OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS --
Springer v. Philippine Islands --
4. THE JUDICIAL BRANCH --
ITS POWER AND RELATION TO THE POLITICAL BRANCHES --
Ex Parte McCardle --
Michaelson v. United States --
Ex Parte Grossman --
Mississippi v. Johnson --
Ex Parte Bakelite Corporation --
5. THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH --
LEGISLATIVE INVESTIGATIONS --
McGrain v. Daugherty --
Watkins v. United States --
THE DELEGATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWER --
J. W. Hampton, Jr. &amp; Co. v. United States --
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. --
United States United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation --
6. THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH --
CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT --
Commander in Chief --
Korematsu v. United States The Steel Seizure Case: Youngstown Sheet &amp; Tube Co. --
v. Sawyer --
Chief of Foreign Relations --
United States v. Belmont  --
Protector of the Peace --
In Re Neagle --
POLITICAL CONTROL OVER ADMINISTRATION --
Myers v. United States --
Humphrey's Executor (Rathbun) v. United States --
SECTION C. Constitutional Relationships in the Federal System --
7. DIVISION OF POWER BETWEEN NATION AND STATES DELEGATED NATURE OF NATIONAL POWER OVER --
DOMESTIC AFFAIRS --
Kansas v. Colorado --
Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins --
INHERENT NATIONAL POWER OVER FOREIGN AFFAIRS --
Fong Yue Ting v. United States --
DOCTRINE OF IMPLIED POWERS --
McCulloch v. Maryland (part) --
DOCTRINE OF THE SUPREMACY OF NATIONAL LAW --
McCulloch v. Maryland (continued) --
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee --
Pennsylvania v. Nelson --
8. COOPERATION BETWEEN STATE AND NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS --
Ex Parte Siebold --
9. TERRITORIES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA --
Balzac v. Porto Rico --
10. STATUS OF STATES IN THE UNION --
Coyle v. Smith --
United States v. California --
11. INTERSTATE RELATIONS --
FULL FAITH AND CREDIT AND INTERSTATE RENDITION --
Kentucky v. Dennison --
Suits between States: Interstate Compacts --
South Dakota v. North Carolina --
Hinderlider v. La Plata Co. --
SECTION D. Powers of the National Government --
12. THE POWER TO TAX AND SPEND --
DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES --
Hylton v. United States --
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan &amp; Trust Co. --
UNIFORM TAXES --
Knowlton v. Moore --
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TAX IMMUNITY --
Basis of the Immunity and Its Early Growth --
Collector v. Day --
Limits on the Immunity --
Metcalf &amp; Eddy v. Mitchell --
South Carolina v. United States --
Graves v. New York ex rel. O'Keefe --
Wilmette Park District v. Campbell --
TAXATION AS AN INSTRUMENT OF REGULATION --
University of Illinois v. United States --
McCray v. United States --
Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Company: Child Labor Tax Case --
United States v. Doremus --
THE SPENDING POWER --
The Social-Security Act Cases: Charles C. Steward Machine Co. v. Davis --
13. POWER OVER INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE --
INTRODUCTION --
Gibbons v. Ogden --
STATE POWER IN THE FIELD OF INTERSTATE COMMERCE The Cooley Rule --
Cooley The Board of Wardens of the Port of  Philadelphia --
The Original Package Doctrine --
Brown v. Maryland --
Divesting Statutes --
Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Ry. Co. --
State Police Power Affecting Interstate Commerce --
California v. Thompson --
South Carolina --State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros. --
Edwards v. California --
State Taxes Affecting Interstate Commerce --
Sonneborn Bros. v. Cureton --
Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.  --
GROWTH OF CONGRESSIONAL POWER OVER COMMERCE --
Commerce Power: Scope and Content --
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association --
Commerce Power: Control over Local Affairs --
Shreveport Case: The Houston, East &amp; West Texas Ry. --
Co. v. United States --
National Labor Relations Board v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corporation --
Commerce Power: A National Police Power --
Hammer v. Dagenhart --
United States v. Darby --
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. --
14. THE WAR POWERS --
Woods v. Miller --
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority --
15. THE TREATY POWERS --
Missouri v. Holland --
Part II RELATIONS BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL AND HIS GOVERNMENT --
SECTION A. Liberty against Government --</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">16. PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN THE K EARLY CONSTITUTION --
Ex POST FACTO LAWS --
Calder v. Bull --
BILLS OF ATTAINDER --
United States v. Lovett --
17. THE BILL OF RIGHTS --
BILL OF RIGHTS RESTRICTS ONLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT --
Barron v. Baltimore --
SCOPE AND CONTENT OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS --
Unreasonable Searches and Seizures --
Boyd v. United States --
Olmstead v. United States --
United States v. Rabinowitz --
Weeks v. United States --
Self-incrimination --
Brown v. Walker --
Ullmann v. United States --
Rogers v. United States --
Double Jeopardy --
United States v. Lanza --
Grand Jury Indictment --
Trial by Jury --
Patton v. United States --
Thiel v. Southern Pacific Company --
Jury Trial and Habeas Corpus under Military Authority --
Ex Parte Milligan --
United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles --
Reid v. Covert --
Confrontation of Witnesses --
Assistance of Counsel --
Speedy Trial --
Due Process of Law: Fifth Amendment --
THE CONTRACT CLAUSE --
The Dartmouth College Case: The Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward --
Home Building &amp; Loan Association v. Blaisdell --
18. THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT --
EARLY JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT --
Privileges and Immunities of United States Citizenship --
The Slaughterhouse Cases --
Maxwell v. Dow --
Due Process of Law: Fourteenth Amendment --
EVOLUTION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW --
Due Process and the Police Power --
Business Affected with a Public Interest --
Munn v. Illinois --
Nebbia v. New York --
Health, Morals, and Safety --
Jacobson v. Massachusetts --
Conditions of Labor: Liberty of Contract --
Lochner v. New York --
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish --
Due Process and the Bill of Rights --
Selective Assimilation of the Bill of Rights into Due Process --
Hurtado v. California --
Palko v. Connecticut --
Due Process and Fair Procedure --
Powell v. Alabama --
Twining v. New Jersey --
Wolf v. Colorado --
Winters v. New York --
Wieman v. Updegraff --
Breithaupt v. Abram --
19. PROTECTION OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS --
FREE SPEECH AND PRESS --
Protection of National Security --
Sedition and Subversion --
Schenck v. United States --
Gitlow v. New York --
Dennis v. United States --
Yates v. United States --
Subversion in the Labor Movement --
American Communications Association (CIO) v. Douds --
Subversion in Government Employment --
Adler v. Board of Education --
Protection of the Administration of Justice --
Bridges v. California --
Protection of Public Order --
Feiner v. New York --
Kunz v. New York --
Protection of Public Morals --
Near v. Minnesota --
Burstyn v. Wilson --
Postal Censorship --
Free Speech in Labor and Government Employment --
Thornhill v. Alabama --
United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell --
Economic Control of the Press --
FREEDOM OF RELIGION --
Murdock v. Pennsylvania --
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette --
ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION --
Everson v. Board of Education --
Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Education --
Zorach v. Clauson --
FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY --
De Jonge v. Oregon --
FREEDOM OF PETITION --
20. EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS --
PRINCIPLES OF VALID CLASSIFICATION --
RACE DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL PROTECTION --
Norris v. Alabama --
Shelley v. Kraemer --
Plessy v. Ferguson --
Sweatt v. Painter --
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka --
Bolling v. Sharpe --
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ALIENS --
21. PROTECTION OF POLITICAL RIGHTS RIGHT --
TO VOTE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS --
Ex Parte Yarbrough: The Ku Klux Cases --
United States v. Classic --
RIGHT TO VOTE IN STATE ELECTIONS --
Guinn v. United States --
Smith v. Allwright --
RIGHT TO EQUAL REPRESENTATION --
Colegrove v. Green --
SECTION B. Positive Protection of Civil Rights --
22. FEDERAL POWER TO PROTECT INDIVIDUALS --
The Civil Rights Cases --
THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS --
SLAVERY AND PEONAGE --
SECTION C. Citizenship and Its Privileges --
23. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP --
United States v. Wong Kim Ark --
24. STATE CITIZENSHIP: THE COMITY CLAUSE --
Toomer v. Witsell --
25. CASES ADDED, 1963 --
Barenblatt v. United States --
Mapp v. Ohio --
Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board --
Times Film Corp. v. Chicago --
Engel v. Vitale --
Baker v. Carr --
26. CASES ADDED, 1964 --
Malloy v. Hogan --
Murphy v. Waterfront Comm. of N. Y. --
Escobedo v. Illinois --
Reynolds v. Sims --
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez --
Appendix: Constitution of the United States --
Index.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Constitutions</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Constitutional law -- United States</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Constitutional amendments -- United States</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">United States -- Constitutional law -- Cases</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cushman, Robert E.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="850" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">LB</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">20121</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">20121</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">25</subfield>
    <subfield code="k"> &#xE19;&#xE35;&#xE25;&#xE27;&#xE31;&#xE2A;&#xE19;&#xE4C; &#xE2D;&#xE34;&#xE19;&#xE17;&#xE23;&#xE31;&#xE01;&#xE29;&#xE32;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">CLAW</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">KD 35.U6.1 C87C 1965</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">3961135190</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2017-06-09 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">c. 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2017-06-09</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">LB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">CLAW</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="m">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">KD 35.U6.1 C87C 1965</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">3961135183</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-08-14 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="s">2024-07-26</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">c. 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2017-06-09</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">LB</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
