01793nam a22002417a 4500 NALT 20240814173957.0 s2002 eng d 0642711666 NALT eng Orders' australian Senate practice : supplement updates to 31 December 2001 [10th] S.l. : The Senate, Australia, 2002 12 p.: tables ; 25 cm. after paragraph 3 -- The proportionality of representation produced by the Senate electoral system compares very favouranly eith the results of other proportional systems, such as those of the Tasmanian House of Assembly and the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly , as indieated by the outcomes of their generil elections in 1998 and 2001, respectively . -- paragraph 5, end (8/8/2001,J.4617: 27/8/2001, J.4761) -- after paragraph 5 Documents would not haave to by in the possession of a semator to attract the immunity. for example, documents scuh as briefing notes provided by an advicer to a senator for the purposes of proceedings in the Senate or a committee and in the possession of the adviser would be immune from seizure from the adviser. -- The "dominant purpose" test applied by the courts in respect of legla professional privilege (Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of taxation, 1999 74 ALJR 339) would probably also be applied to documents to determine their immunity under parliamentary privilege... Australia. Parliament. Senate -- Rule and practices Parliamentary practice -- Australia Senate -- Australia -- Standing orders NALT LB lcc 20831 20831 25 นีลวัสน์ อินทรักษา KD219.A8.42 S72 2002 0 0 0 0 CLAW NALT NALT 0 KD 219.A8.42 S72 2002 3961142118 2017-06-09 00:00:00 2017-06-09 LB