<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>09244nma a22002657a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250217191226.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      s2007                        eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9789076871813</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">KD 35.E86 </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">N37 2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">National parliaments and European democracy : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">a bottom-up approach to European constitutionalism /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">edited by Olaf Tans, Carla Zoethout, and Jit Peters.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Groningen : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Europa Law Publishing, </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2007.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">253 p. :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill., table ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">24 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Introduction: National Parliaments and the European CHAPTER 1 Union; In Search of Common Ground Olaf Tans --
1. Introduction  --
2. A Bottom-up Approach to European Constitutionalism Research-design --
3 Conceptualising 'National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making' --
3.1 A Threefold Analysis of National Constitutional Regimes I Constitutional Norms Regarding National Parliamentary  Control of EU Decision-making --
II The Relevance of Practices and Habits --
III Widening the Scope to the Political System and Culture a Large --
4. Conclusion  --
Appendix: Questionnaire --
The Finnish Eduskunta: Effective Scrutiny, Partisan CHAPTER 2 Consensus Tapio Raunio --
1. Introduction --
2. Background: Constitutional Reform and Preparing for EU- Membership--
3. Controlling the Government in EU Matters --
3.1 Accountability and Control Instruments --
3.2 Scrutiny of EU Matters --
3.4 Partisan Consensus --
3.4 Attitudes towards Interparliamentary Cooperation --
4. The Eduskunta and the Constitutional Treaty --
5 Conclusion --
4 Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making in Germany; Supportive Federal Scrutiny and Restrictive CHAPTER 3 Regional Action Daniel Thym --
1. Introduction --
2 Constitutional Framework --
3. Normative Framework --
4. Information: Irrelevance through Overload? --
4.1 Normative Concept --
4.2 Practice and Problems --
4.3 The Way Ahead --
5. Bundestag: Supportive Scrutiny --
5.1 Practice and Problems
5.2 Normative Concept --
5.3 Way Ahead --
6 Bundesrat: Preserving Federalism --
6.1 Normative Concept --
6.2 Practice and Problems --
6.3 Way Ahead --
7. Conclusion --
EU Affairs before the United Kingdom Parliament; A CHAPTER 4 Case of Scrutiny as Substitute Sovereignty? Adam Cygan --
1. Introduction --
2 The Legal, Political and Constitutional Context of Scrutiny --
3 Brief History of Parliamentary Scrutiny in the United Kingdom --
4. The Heterogeneity of National Scrutiny Procedures --
5. Scrutiny of European Union Legislation by the Westminster Parliament --
6 The House of Commons - European Scrutiny Committee --
7 The House of Lords - Select Committee on the Union and its Sub-Committees European --
8 Impact of the Scrutiny Process within the UK Parliament --
9 Scrutiny as Substitute Sovereignty? --
&#x399;&#x39F; Future Reform of the UK Scrutiny Process --

Belgian Parliaments and EU Decision-making: "In the CHAPTER 5 Government We Trust" Hendrik Vos, Sofie Staelraeve, Carl Devos, Jan Orbie, Hilde Van Liefferinge, An Schrijvers --
1. Introduction --
2 How Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making is Organised in Belgium --
2.1 A Uniquely Composed Federal Advisory Committee --
2.2 The Functioning of the Federal Advisory Committee --
2.3 The Standing Committees and European affairs --
2.4 The Flow of Information 
2.5 Control of EU Decision-making by the Federal Parliament - an Evaluation --
2.6 The European Role of Regions and Communities --
2.7 Regional Parliaments and EU Decision-making: The Case of Flanders --
3 Why Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making in Belgium is Weak --
3.1 Normative Signs of a Powerful Parliament --
3.2 Belgium: "The Most Thorough Example of Consociational Democracy" --
3.3 Belgium: An Ever Further Federalizing State --
4. Conclusion --
Control of EU Decision-making in the Hungarian CHAPTER 6 National Assembly: the Experience of a new Member State Klara Szalay and Angela Juhasz-T&#xF3;th --
1. Introduction --
2 Norms and Powers Regulating National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making --
3 Scrutiny of EU Affairs in the National Assembly --
3.1 Scope of Information 3.2 Process of Discussion --
3.3 Parliamentary Influence --
3.4  Other Forms of Parliamentary Control --
4. Dilemmas Relating to the Practice of Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making --
5 Widening the Perspective --
6 Conclusion --
The Parliament of Austria: A "Normative" Tiger? CHAPTER 7 Barbara Bl&#xFC;mel and Christine Neuhold --
1 Introduction --
2 Norms Regulating the Flow of Information about EU --Decision-making (with a Link to the Respective Provisions U in the Constitutional Treaty) --
3 Norms Regulating National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making and Institutional Setting of Parliamentary Scrutiny --
3.1 Legal Provisions Regulating Parliamentary Participation --
3.2 The Institutional Setting of Parliamentary Scrutiny --
4. Evaluation of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU Affairs --
4.1 The Scope of Parliamentary Scrutiny --
4.1.1 The Number of Documents Submitted to the Austrian Parliament --
4.1.2 The Number of EC/EU Documents Actually Considered by Parliament --
4.2 The Political Implications of Parliamentary Scrutiny --
5. Discussion --
6 Concluding Remarks --</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Dutch Parliament and the EU; A Constitutional CHAPTER 8 Analysis Olaf Tans --
1 Introduction --
2. Some General Constitutional Features --
3 Controlling Power --
3.I Constitutional Norms Governing the Flow of Information about EU Decision-making --
3.2 Constitutional Norms Governing the Power to Influence EU Decision-making --
4. Practices and Habits Affecting Parliamentary Controlling 4 Power --
4.I General Procedures to Control EU Decision-making --
4.2 The Approval-procedure concerning Decision-making in the Third Pillar --
4.3 The Joint Committee on the Application of Subsidiarity --
5 Complications of the Dutch Scrutiny-system --
5.1 The Fiction of Ministerial Responsibility --
5.2 Low Level of Parliamentary Involvement --
5.3 The Non-political Nature of Parliamentary Scrutiny --
6 Conclusion --
National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making in Denmark APTER 9 Peter Riis --
1. Introduction: Denmark's Hesitant Approach to the EU --
2. Constitutional Background of the Danish Scrutiny System --
2.1 The Danish Parliamentary System --
2.2 The Danish Constitution on Foreign Policy, Referendums and Transfer of Sovereignty --
2.3 The Legal Basis of the Mandate System --
3 The Danish Decision-making Process with regard to European Affairs --
3.1 The National Decision-making Process - In Brief --
3.2 How does the Government obtain a Mandate for Negotiation --
3.4 Referendums on EU-matters - Direct Democracy in Practice --
4. The Parliament's Treatment of EU-issues --
4.1 Early Treatment of EU-issues in the EAC and in the Sector Committees --
4.2 The Subsidiarity Check --
4.3 Systematic Treatment of Green and White Papers --
4.4 Openness in the European Affairs Committee --
4.5 Cooperation with Members of the European Parliament --
5. Conclusion and Future Perspectives --
Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making in the CHAPTER IO Czech Republic Lenka P&#xED;trov&#xE1; and Martina Coxov&#xE1; --
1. Introduction --
2.The General Idea of the Czech Scrutiny System --
3 Constitutional Norms Governing Parliamentary Control --
3.I The 'Euro-amendment' to the Czech Constitution --
3.2 The 'Euro-amendments' to the Rules of Procedure of Czech Parliament --
3.2.1 The Euro-amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies --
3.2.2 The Euro-amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate --
3.3 The Government Directive on Transmission of Draft European Legislative Proposals to the Parliament --
4. Assessment of the Enacted Amendments --
4 The Chamber of Deputies --
4.1 The Senate --
4.2 Experiences with the New Model of Parliamentary Control --
5 The Chamber of Deputies --
5.1 The Senate --
6 Some Comments on a Future and Better Organisation of National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-Making --
7. Conclusion --
Conclusion: National Parliaments and the European Union; Coping with the Limits of Democracy Olaf Tans --
1. Introduction --
2 National Constitutions and European Scrutiny: Exploring Common Ground --
2.1 The Pivotal Role of Ministerial Responsibility --
2.2 The Contours of a Common Practice --
2.3 A Common Political Culture? --
2.4 Conclusion --
3. The Future Role of National Parliaments in the EU - Issues for Debate --
3.1 The Limits of Ministerial Responsibility --
3.2 Vices and Virtues of Ex Ante Mechanisms --
3.3 More Direct Involvement of National Parliaments in EU  Decision-making? --
3.4 Going Beyond the Input-legitimising Role of National Parliaments --
3.5 A Plea for More Debate in National Parliaments --
4 Conclusion --
Contributors. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">15162</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">15164</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Legislative bodies</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">15166</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">15167</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Tans, Olaf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">49470</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Peters, Jit.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">49471</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Zoethout, Carla M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="850" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">LB</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">local</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">54650</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">54650</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">25</subfield>
    <subfield code="k"> &#xE19;&#xE35;&#xE25;&#xE27;&#xE31;&#xE2A;&#xE19;&#xE4C; &#xE2D;&#xE34;&#xE19;&#xE17;&#xE23;&#xE31;&#xE01;&#xE29;&#xE32;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">local</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">CLAW</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">NALT</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">&#xE08;&#xE31;&#xE14;&#xE0B;&#xE37;&#xE49;&#xE2D;&#xE17;&#xE23;&#xE31;&#xE1E;&#xE22;&#xE32;&#xE01;&#xE23;</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">9700.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">KD 35.E86 N37  2007</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">3961170439</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2017-06-09 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">9750.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2017-06-09</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">LB</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
